Cases 31 - 40 of 85
Evans v. DHL Supply Chain
as 3:2019cv00085
Plaintiff:
Donovan Evans
Defendant:
DHL Supply Chain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Castine et al v. Accelore Group, L.L.C. et al
as 1:2018cv00496
Defendant:
Accelore Group, L.L.C. and DHL Express (USA), Inc.
Plaintiff:
Rayan Black, Justin Castine and Marta-Maria Tablas-Tozo
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Northwest Administrators, Inc v. DHL Express (USA), Inc
as 2:2017cv01522
Plaintiff:
Northwest Administrators Inc
Defendant:
DHL Express (USA), Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Northwest Administrators Inc v. DHL Express (USA), Inc.
as 2:2017cv00172
Plaintiff:
Northwest Administrators Inc
Defendant:
DHL Express (USA), Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Romero v. DHL Express (USA), Inc.
as 17-332
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Mauricio Baez Romero
Defendant - Appellee:
DHL Express (USA), Inc.
Center for Advanced Surgical Treatment, LLC v. DPWN Holdings USA, Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv01919
Plaintiff:
Center for Advanced Surgical Treatment, LLC
Defendant:
DPWN Holdings USA, Inc., DHL Express (USA) Inc., Robert Whitaker and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Casper v. DHL Global Customer Solutions (USA), Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv40035
Plaintiff:
Rob Casper
Defendant:
DHL Global Customer Solutions (USA), Inc. and DHL Customer Solutions & Innovations (USA), Inc.
Cause Of Action: Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Casper v. DHL Global Customer Solutions (USA), Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv40035
Plaintiff:
Rob Casper
Defendant:
DHL Global Customer Solutions (USA), Inc. and DHL Customer Solutions & Innovations (USA), Inc.
Cause Of Action: Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Edguardo Duran v. DHL Express USA) Inc et al
as 2:2015cv09965
Defendant:
DHL Express, DHL Express USA Inc, DHL Worldwide Express and others
Plaintiff:
Edguardo Duran
Antoine Arrington v. DHL Express (USA), Inc.
as 2:2015cv08247
Plaintiff:
Antoine Arrington
Defendant:
DHL Express USA, Inc. and Does
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
