Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03437
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00823
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
CUNNINGHAM v. GARLAND et al
as 3:2024cv00014
Petitioner:
ALEJANDRO CUNNINGHAM
Defendant:
DHS SECRETARY ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL MERRICK GARLAND, MERRICK GARLAND, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv22263
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Mack v. USA
as 23-60558
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joy Mack, Others so Affected
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, United States Department of Justice, and U.S. Attorney General Merrick B. Garland, HHS Office for Human Research Protections, and OHRP Director Dr. Jerry A. Menikoff and others
Velasquez Ramirez et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2023cv01052
Plaintiff:
Araceli Jervandita Velasquez Ramirez and Jorge Antonio Velasquez
Defendant:
DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, USCIS, USCIS Director UR MENDOZA JADDOU and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv01734
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv07010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv06964
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
