Cases 11 - 20 of 68
BOATRIGHT v. DOBBS
as 1:2022cv01685
Petitioner:
JOHN BOATRIGHT
Respondent:
DOBBS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nelson v. County of Kenosha et al
as 2:2022cv00841
Plaintiff:
Kari Nelson
Defendant:
Kenosha County, David Beth, Ltd Daniel Ruth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dobbs v. Gonzales et al
as 3:2022cv50258
Plaintiff:
John C. Dobbs
Defendant:
Gonzales, J. Leonowicz, Stuer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
MITCHELL v. DOBBS
as 1:2022cv00756
Petitioner:
RICHARD ALLEN MITCHELL
Respondent:
BYRAN DOBBS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DOBBS v. GORE
as 1:2022cv00664
Plaintiff:
JESSE DOBBS
Defendant:
STATE REP. MITCH GORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Padilla v. Clark et al
as 1:2022cv01053
Plaintiff:
Carlos Padilla, III
Defendant:
Tiffanie Clark, Jennifer Meaker, Wexford Health Sources Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOBBS v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP et al
as 1:2022cv00194
Plaintiff:
DAVID DOBBS
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP, POWERHOUSE RETAIL SERVICES, LLC and IMPERIAL REMODELING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DOBBS v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2021cv01625
Plaintiff:
MELANIE L. DOBBS and MELANIE DOBBS
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL and KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
DOBBS et al v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2021cv01504
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL LLC, COOK INCORPORATED and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DOBBS and ELAINE DOBBS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cole et al v. ACD Emergency Road Services LLC et al
as 1:2021cv02276
Defendant:
Camara Bowden, ACD Emergency Road Services LLC and DANTEA GRAYSON
Plaintiff:
Robert A Cole, Leon Dobbs and Robert Cole
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
