Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5280
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Holliman v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv01370
Plaintiff: Leroy James Holliman
Defendant: CoreCivic, Inc. dba Northeast Ohio Correctional Center, CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC, john Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doe v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2022cv00566
Plaintiff: John Doe and John Doe, 22-566
Defendant: State of Tennessee, Hon. Suzanne Lockert-Mash and Corrine Nichole Oliver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe 20 et al v. Eastern Michigan University Board of Regents et al
as 2:2021cv12095
Plaintiff: Jane Doe 20, Jane Doe 21, Jane Doe 22 and others
Defendant: Eastern Michigan University Board of Regents, Melody Werner, Eastern Michigan University Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John and Jane Doe 1, et al. v. Springboro Community City School District et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00785
Plaintiff: John Doe 1-12, John and Jane Doe 4, John and Jane Doe 7 and others
Defendant: John Austin Hopkins, Carrie Corder, Daniel Schroer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Lux Vide Finanziaria Per Iniziative Audiovisive e Telematiche S.p.A. v. Unknown Party #1 et al
as 1:2019cv00680
Defendant: John Doe 5 d/b/a speedvideo.net, John Doe 22 d/b/a videowood.tv, John Doe 4 d/b/a openloads.co and others
Plaintiff: Lux Vide Finanziaria Per Iniziative Audiovisive e Telematiche S.p.A.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Doe 22 et al v. Michigan State University et al
as 1:2019cv00178
Defendant: Michigan State University, Twistars USA, Inc. d/ba Geddert's Twistars Gymnastics Club USA, Kathie Klages and others
Plaintiff: Jane Does 22 and 23
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maria Muniz-Muniz, et al v. United States Border Patrol, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-3400
Plaintiff: MARIA MUNIZ-MUNIZ, ROBERTO MUNIZ, ANTONIO TORRES-FRANCO and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: OHIO IMMIGRANT WORKER PROJECT and FARM LABOR ORGANIZING COMMITTEE, AFL-CIO
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES BORDER PATROL, Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security, JOHN DOES 19-21, individually and in their official capacities as Norwalk Ohio Police Department officers and JOHN DOES 1-9, in their capacity as United States Border Patrol Agents assigned or working from the Sandusky, Ohio Border Patrol Station
Defendant: RANDY GALLEGOS, JOHN DOES 1-15, individually and in their capacity as United States Border Patrol Agents assigned or working from the Sandusky, Ohio United States Border Patrol Station, BRADLEY SHAVER and others
Maria Muniz-Muniz, et al v. United States Border Patrol, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-4419
Plaintiff: MARIA MUNIZ-MUNIZ, ROBERTO MUNIZ, JUANA MUNIZ-TORRES and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: ROCIO ANANI SAUCEDO-CARRILLO, individually and on behalf of a class of others similarly situated, ROSA CARRILLO-VASQUES, ALFONSO PALAFOX and others
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES BORDER PATROL, Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security, RANDY GALLEGOS, in his official capacity as Chief Patrol Agent, Detroit Sector, United States Border Patrol, in his official capacity as Chief Patrol Agent, Detroit Sector, United States Border Patrol, BRADLEY SHAVER, in his official capacity as Chief of Police Department, Norwalk, Ohio and others
Defendant: KEVIN CASHEN, et al
Muniz et al v. Gallegos et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv02865
Plaintiff: Roberto Muniz, Roberto Muniz, Roberto Muniz and others
Defendant: Randy L. Gallegos, Jeffrey A. Briggs, Kevin Cashen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?