Cases 31 - 40 of 1,218
Sutter & Gillham PLLC, et al v. Judy Henry, et al
as 24-1071
Plaintiff:
Sutter & Gillham PLLC, Luther Oneal Sutter and Lucien R. Gillham
Defendant:
Judy Simmons Henry, Jacob Post Fair, Scott A. Irby and others
Cora Wong v. Modern HR, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Cora Wong
Defendant:
Modern HR, Inc., My Suite, LLC, NMS Properties, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv10669
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv02593
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
R.J. Kulick v. James Murchie et al
as 2:2023cv10915
Plaintiff:
R. J. Kulick
Defendant:
James Murchie, Marlynn Block, Richard Loomis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02379
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Godbolt v. Hinds County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2023cv03168
Plaintiff:
Calvin Godbolt
Defendant:
Hinds County, Mississippi and John and Jane Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
C. et al v. Town of Atherton et al
as 3:2024cv00507
Plaintiff:
K. C. and D. B.
Defendant:
Town of Atherton, David Metzger, Diego Romero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
JONES v. SHIPIRO et al
as 2:2023cv04879
Plaintiff:
JOHN JONES, JR
Defendant:
JOSH SHIPIRO, DOES 1-100 INCLUSIVE, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, et al and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
