Cases 1 - 10 of 360
Fitzgerald v. Doe, et al
as 2:2024cv00934
Defendant:
Defendant 1, John Does 1-20 and Lisa
Plaintiff:
George Edward Fitzgerald, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Whitehead v. The Mississippi Department of Public Safety et al
as 1:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Bobby Whitehead
Defendant:
The Mississippi Department of Public Safety, R. T. Vaughn and John Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MYATT et al
as 2:2024cv00848
Not Yet Classified:
DEFENDANT 1, CINDY and John Does 1-20
Plaintiff:
DARYL MYATT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Li v. Defendant 1, a/k/a "Annie" et al
as 4:2024cv00812
Plaintiff:
Phillip Li
Defendant:
Defendant 1, a/k/a "Annie" and John Does 1 - 20
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Chow v. Defendant 1 et al
as 2:2024cv00480
Defendant:
Defendant 1, Kai Xuan Wang, John Does 1-20 and others
Plaintiff:
Virginia S. Chow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Cheng v. Gomez et al
as 4:2024cv00674
Plaintiff:
Sheng-Wen Cheng
Defendant:
Natzely Gomez, Angel Gomez and Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Halo Mining Limited v. Monbanc Corporation et al
as 4:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
HALO MINING LIMITED
Defendant:
NORTHDATA HOLDINGS, INC., MONBANC CORPORATION, DANIEL RAFUSE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Moore et al v. The City of Columbus et al
as 1:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Dymon Moore and Gassey Williams
Defendant:
The City of Columbus and John Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Removal - Civil Rights Act
White v. State of Texas
as 23-11190
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jacob White
Defendant / Appellee:
State of Texas, City of Grapevine, Bruno Rumbelow, City Manager in its Individual and Official Capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
