Cases 51 - 60 of 1,064
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv03675
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Viet Huynh v. Global Processing Services, LLC et al
as 8:2022cv01844
Plaintiff:
Viet Huynh
Defendant:
Global Processing Services, LLC, Jalpha Powell, James Powell and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02673
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Suffolk County Police Benevolent Association et al v. County of Suffolk et al
as 2:2022cv05803
Plaintiff:
Suffolk County Police Benevolent Association and Noel DiGerolamo
Defendant:
County of Suffolk, The Suffolk County Board of Ethics, Eric A. Kopp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
TOBIN v. MARGIOTTA et al
as 3:2022cv05613
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW TOBIN
Defendant:
MICHAEL MARGIOTTA, PATIENT IDENTIFICATION PLATFORM, INC. and JOHN/JANE DOES (1-5)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv01679
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Burback v. Oblon
as 22-40609
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dennis Burback, Ken Eddy and Mark Andersen
Defendant / Appellee:
Robert Oblon, Jordan Brock, Jeff Bollinger and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv01447
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Alcock, Jr v. Doe (1-5)
as 4:2022cv00433
Plaintiff:
Gordon Bradford Alcock
Defendant:
John Doe (1-5)
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Viet Huynh v. S.A.R and Associates, LLC et al
as 8:2022cv01210
Plaintiff:
Viet Huynh
Defendant:
S.A.R & Associates, LLC and Doe 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
