Cases 1 - 10 of 64
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02222
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv07481
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Espiricueta v. Todd Investment Company et al
as 3:2018cv01593
Defendant:
Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group, Inc., Hertz Corporation, DTG Operations, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Rueben Espiricueta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
Thomas v. Dollar Rent A Car et al
as 4:2017cv00586
Plaintiff:
Sola Thomas
Defendant:
Dollar Rent A Car, Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group Inc and Hertz Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
John Yohan Lee v. Jerome Miller et al
as 2:2016cv08685
Defendant:
Doe Defendant 1, Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group, Inc. and Jerome Miller
Plaintiff:
John Yohan Lee
Friedman, et al v. Dollar Thrifty Automotive, et al
as 15-709
Petitioner:
DR. ALLEN FRIEDMAN, MICHAEL J. NELLIS, PAUL R. PEAVEY and others
Respondent:
DOLLAR THRIFTY AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, INC., DOLLAR RENT A CAR, INC. and DTG OPERATIONS, INC.
Friedman, et al v. Dollar Thrifty Automotive, et al
as 15-708
Petitioner:
ALLEN FRIEDMAN, Dr., MICHAEL J. NELLIS, PAUL R. PEAVEY and others
Respondent:
DOLLAR THRIFTY AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, INC., DOLLAR RENT A CAR, INC. and DTG OPERATIONS, INC.
Friedman, et al v. Dollar Thrifty Automotive, et al
as 15-708
Petitioner:
ALLEN FRIEDMAN, Dr., MICHAEL J. NELLIS, PAUL R. PEAVEY and others
Respondent:
DOLLAR THRIFTY AUTOMOTIVE GROUP, INC., DOLLAR RENT A CAR, INC. and DTG OPERATIONS, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv04562
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv22959
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
