Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Baker v. Corelle Brands LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00016
Plaintiff: Samantha Baker
Defendant: Corelle Brands LLC, Instant Brands, Inc. and Instant Brands, Inc. f/k/a Double Insight, Inc. d/b/a Instant Pot Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WILLIAMS v. CORNELL CAPITAL LLC et al
as 2:2023cv04706
Plaintiff: KRISSY WILLIAMS
Defendant: CORNELL CAPITAL LLC, INSTANT BRANDS, INC. f/k/a DOUBLE INSIGHT INC., d/b/a INSTANT POT COMPANY, INSTANT BRANDS LLC, d/b/a INSTANT POT COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Havens et al v. Instant Brands, Inc.
as 1:2022cv02909
Defendant: Instant Brands, Inc. formerly known as Double Insight, Inc. doing business as Instant Pot Company, Double Insight, Inc. and Instant Brands LLC
Plaintiff: Michelle Havens and Elsie Wilkerson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jaimes v. Instant Brands, Inc., f/k/a Double Insight, Inc., d/b/a Instant Pot Company
as 1:2020cv00590
Plaintiff: Maria Jaimes
Defendant: Instant Brands, Inc., f/k/a Double Insight, Inc., d/b/a Instant Pot Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Orlik-walski v. Instant Brands Inc.
as 1:2020cv03258
Defendant: Instant Brands Inc., Instant Brands Inc. formerly known as Double Insight Inc. doing business as Instant Pot Compant and Double Insight Inc.
Plaintiff: Jennifer Orlik-walski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pedigo v. Instant Brands, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00026
Defendant: Double Insight, Inc. and Instant Brands, Inc.
Plaintiff: Makayla Ann Pedigo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pedigo v. Instant Brands, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00025
Defendant: Double Insight, Inc. and Instant Brands, Inc.
Plaintiff: Makayla Ann Pedigo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
S.P.S. v. INSTANT BRANDS INC, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv00212
Defendant: INSTANT BRANDS INC, DOUBLE INSIGHT INC and DOUBLE INSIGHT INC doing business as INSTANT POT COMPANY
Plaintiff: MINOR CHILD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pao v. Instant Brands, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv08070
Defendant: Double Insight, Inc., Instant Brands, Inc. and Double Insight, Inc. a Canadian Corporation doing business as Instant Pot Company
Plaintiff: Jenny Tze-Jay Pao
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Instant Brands, Inc. et al
as 5:2019cv00113
Plaintiff: Dustin Matthew Smith
Defendant: Instant Brands, Inc. and Double Insight, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?