Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv03518
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Earnest Vaughn, Sr. v. SCDC Health Services
as 26-6047
Plaintiff:
EARNEST EDWARD VAUGHN, a/k/a Earnest E. Vaughn, Sr., a/k/a Earnest E. Vaughn, a/k/a Earnest Edward Vaughn, Sr.
Defendant:
SCDC DIVISION OF HEALTH SERVICES, ROXANNE LAPOINTE, D. PHILLIPS and others
Vaughn, Sr v. SCDC Health Services et al
as 6:2025cv13381
Plaintiff:
Earnest Vaughn, Sr, Earnest E Vaughn, Earnest Edward Vaughn and others
Defendant:
SCDC Health Services, Dr. Way, Roxanne LaPointe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
McKenzie v. Chong
as 2:2024cv06679
Defendant:
Dr. Wai Yee Chong
Plaintiff:
Kellyann A. McKenzie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
McKenzie v. Chung
as 2:2023cv04520
Plaintiff:
Kellyann A. McKenzie
Respondent:
Dr. Wai Yee Chung
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
McKenzie v. Chung
as 1:2023cv04760
Plaintiff:
Kellyann A. McKenzie
Defendant:
Dr. Wai Yee Chung
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Daniel McClain v. Lefford Fate
as 16-7470
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL R. MCCLAIN
Defendant - Appellee:
LEFFORD FATE, et alia, SAMUEL SOLTIS, Assc Dir, JOHN B. TOMARCHIO, Med Dir and others
Daniel McClain v. Lefford Fate
as 16-7474
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL R. MCCLAIN
Defendant - Appellee:
LEFFORD FATE, et alia, SAMUEL SOLTIS, Assc Dir, JOHN B. TOMARCHIO, Med Dir and others
McClain v. Fate et al
as 0:2015cv04516
Plaintiff:
Daniel R McClain
Defendant:
Lefford Fate, Samuel Soltis, John B Tomarchio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Wilson v. Way et al
as 5:2015cv00025
Plaintiff:
Jimmy W Wilson
Defendant:
Dr Way, Darrell Harrison, Dr McRee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
