Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 324
Famiglietti vs. Paysafecard.com et al
as 1:2016cv11784
Plaintiff: Tracy Smith, Alicia Ferdula, Scott Murphy and others
Defendant: Paysafecard.com, FANDUEL DEPOSITS, LLC, DraftKings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DeGroot v. DraftKings, Inc.
as 1:2016cv11063
Plaintiff: Michael DeGroot
Defendant: DraftKings Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DANIELS et al v. FANDUEL, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv01230
Plaintiff: AKEEM DANIELS, CAMERON STINGILY and NICHOLAS STONER
Defendant: DRAFTKINGS, INC. and FANDUEL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Miller et al v. DraftKings, Inc.
as TNE/2:16-cv-00103
Plaintiff: Erica Miller and Kinison Miller
Defendant: DraftKings, Inc.
Miller et al v. DraftKings, Inc.
as 2:2016cv00103
Plaintiff: Erica Miller and Kinison Miller
Defendant: DraftKings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
CG Technology Development, LLC et al v. DraftKings, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv00781
Plaintiff: CG Technology Development, LLC, Interactive Games LLC and Interactive Games Limited
Defendant: DraftKings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Carbone et al v. FanDuel, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv10410
Plaintiff: Carbone, Giancarlo Carbone and Jeremy Huard
Defendant: FanDuel, Inc, FanDuel Inc. and DraftKings Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boast v. DraftKings, Inc.
as 1:2016cv10391
Plaintiff: Leah Boast
Defendant: DraftKings Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pope v. DraftKings, Inc.
as 1:2016cv10371
Plaintiff: Jared C Pope
Defendant: DraftKings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Michael Moton et al v. Fanduel, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv10373
Plaintiff: Michael Moton and Jeffrey Wright
Defendant: FanDuel, Inc. and DraftKings Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?