Cases 1 - 10 of 267
Drews et al v. General Motors LLC et al
as 2:2024cv11194
Plaintiff:
Karen Drews and Melvin Drews
Defendant:
General Motors LLC, Onstar LLC, LexisNexis Risk Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Stepanoff et al v. Bite Ninja, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02252
Plaintiff:
Theodore Stepanoff, Bradley McKinney, Ryan P. Cooper and others
Defendant:
Bite Ninja, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Drew v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01904
Plaintiff:
Tracy Drew
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
State Line Construction and Maintenance, LLC et al v. American Line Builders Chapter, NECA et al
as 2:2024cv11046
Plaintiff:
State Line Construction and Maintenance, LLC and Ernest Coger
Defendant:
American Line Builders Chapter, NECA, Local Union 17 International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, American Line Builders Joint Apprenticeship and Training Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
State Line Construction and Maintenance, LLC et al v. American Line Builders Chapter NECA et al
as 2:2024cv11047
Plaintiff:
State Line Construction and Maintenance, LLC and Ernest Coger
Defendant:
American Line Builders Chapter NECA, Local Union No. 17 IBEW, American Line Builders Joint Apprenticeship and Training Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Marshall #732012 v. Rewerts et al
as 1:2024cv00390
Plaintiff:
Calvin Eunice Marshall #732012
Defendant:
Randee Rewerts, Unknown Party #1, Unknown Party #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marshall v. Rewerts et al
as 2:2024cv10872
Plaintiff:
Calvin Eunice Marshall
Defendant:
Rewerts, John Doe, West and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10673
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
