Cases
Tanika Parker, et al v. Tenneco, Inc., et al
as 23-1857
Plaintiff / Appellee: TANIKA PARKER, individually and on behalf of the DRIV 401(K) RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN, and all others similarly situated and ANDREW FARRIER, individually and on behalf of the DRIV 401(K) RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN, and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant: TENNECO, INC., DRIV AUTOMOTIVE, INC., TENNECO AUTOMOTIVE OPERATING COMPANY, INC. and others
Defendant: DOES, 1-30, John and Jane Doe Defendants
Parker et al v. Tenneco Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv10816
Plaintiff: Tanika Parker and Andrew Farrier
Defendant: Tenneco Inc., Driv Automotive Inc, Tenneco Automotive Operating Company Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Mando America Corporation v. DRiV Automotive Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00357
Plaintiff: Mando America Corporation
Defendant: DRiV Automotive Inc. and Tenneco, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Frayer et al v. Tenneco Inc et al
as 3:2022cv00132
Plaintiff: Ryan Frayer and Tanika Parker
Defendant: Tenneco Inc, Driv Automotive Inc, Tenneco Automotive Operating Company Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv04229
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00059
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?