Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Dubsky v. James
as 2:2017cv02116
Plaintiff:
Robert A. Dubsky
Defendant:
Deborah Lee James
Cause Of Action: 10 U.S.C. § 2305
Paul Walker v. Dennis Smith, et al
as 17-16857
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL EDWARD WALKER
Defendant - Appellee:
DENNIS R. SMITH, Former Warden at FCI Phoenix, D. GIFFORD, Captain at FCI Phoenix, J. FEENEY, Special Investigations Agent (SIA) at FCI Phoenix and others
Walker v. Smith et al
as 2:2014cv01893
Plaintiff:
Paul Edward Walker
Defendant:
Dennis R Smith, D Gifford, J Feeney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Walker v. Smith et al
as 2:2014cv00903
Plaintiff:
Paul Edward Walker
Defendant:
Dennis R Smith, D Gifford, J Feeney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jason Saunders v. Jerry Saunders, et al
as 13-16710
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON SAUNDERS
Defendant - Appellee:
JERRY SAUNDERS, KIM HOLLAND, Warden, E. J. CARRILLO and others
Ichihara v. Smith et al
as 2:2013cv01200
Plaintiff:
Richard John Ichihara
Defendant:
Dennis Smith, Unknown Gifford, Unknown Roman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2012cv00795
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hartford Fire Insurance Company et al v. Flagstaff Industries Corp. et al
as 1:2011cv01137
Plaintiff:
Hartford Fire Insurance Company and Hartford Casualty Ins. Co.
Defendant:
Flagstaff Industries Corp., Rue Insurance, Phillip Dubsky and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shadale Williams v. William Duncan, et al
as 08-16176
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHADALE L. WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM DUNCAN, Warden, J. ALLISON, Chief Deputy Warden, R. PARIN, Captain and others
Dubsky v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2008cv03057
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey J Dubsky
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
