Cases 1 - 10 of 28
USA v. Alexander
as 23-30900
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Dwight Alexander
Dwight Rudisill v. Merrick Garland
as 23-6133
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DWIGHT ALEXANDER RUDISILL
Defendant / Appellee:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Department of Justice, Attorney General, in his Official capacity, DAVID ALAN BROWN, SR., Assistant United States Attorney, in his Individual capacity, UNKNOWN UNITED STATES MARSHALS, United States Marshal, in their Individual capacities and others
Dwight Rudisill v. Merrick Garland
as 23-6024
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DWIGHT ALEXANDER RUDISILL
Defendant / Appellee:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Department of Justice, Attorney General, in his Official capacity, DAVID ALAN BROWN, SR., Assistant United States Attorney, in his Individual capacity, UNKNOWN UNITED STATES MARSHALS, United States Marshal, in their Individual capacities and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-6703
Petitioner / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
USA v. Alexander
as 21-30720
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Dwight Alexander
USA v. Frank
as 21-10910
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Dwight Alexander Frank, also known as Scooney
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00026
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Saunders v. Barr
as 19-2732
Petitioner:
Dwight A. Saunders, Dwight Saunders, Dwight Alexander Saunders
Respondent:
William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
PARKS et al v. FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF SAN FRANCISCO et al
as 1:2019cv00883
Defendant:
F. DANIEL SICILIANO, GREG SEIBLY, JOHN F. LUIKART and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY L. SIMONS and LAWRENCE H. PARKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rudisill v. USA
as 1:2019cv00112
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Dwight Alexander Rudisill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
