Cases 1 - 10 of 11
NEWMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2023cv03019
Plaintiff:
DALE NEWMAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Newman v. McCune et al
as 2:2020cv02183
Plaintiff:
Rickey Dale Newman
Defendant:
Marc McCune, Steven Weaver and Brent Grill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEWMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv77280
Plaintiff:
DALE NEWMAN
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Triplett et al v. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv02049
Plaintiff:
Gregory Triplett , Jason Shy , Brian Lewis and others
Defendant:
Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. , Janssen, L.P. , Johnson & Johnson Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dale Newman et al v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 3:2014cv04034
Plaintiff:
Dale Newman and Jane Newman
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A. , Bank of New York Mellon fka The Bank of New York , ReconTrust Company, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dale Newman v. Carolyn W. Colvin
as 2:2014cv01502
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Dale Newman
Newman v. Quarterman et al
as 4:2009cv02024
Plaintiff:
Ernest Dale Newman
Defendant:
Nathan Quarterman, Kevin Mafield, A. Castillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rosas v. Newman
as 3:2008cv05000
Plaintiff:
Tim Rosas
Defendant:
Dale Newman
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Newman v. Quarterman et al
as 4:2008cv00589
Plaintiff:
Ernest Dale Newman
Defendant:
Nathaniel Quarterman, David Weeks, A Castillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newman v. Quarterman
as 4:2007cv01727
Petitioner:
Ernest Dale Newman
Defendant:
Nathan Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
