Cases 1 - 10 of 43
United States of America v. Eldridge
as 26-1798
Defendant:
KASHIKA SPEED, KEVIN ALLEN, THAMUD ELDRIDGE and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Brent Jones v. A. Yarusso, et al
as 26-11769
Plaintiff:
BRENT MICHAEL JONES
Defendant:
A. YARUSSO, H. FITORIA, B. CAMPOS and others
Damus v. Walker
as 1:2026cv02949
Plaintiff:
Rodrigue Damus
Defendant:
Melania Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02558
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Meek (PS) v. Stancil et al
as 1:2026cv00325
Plaintiff:
Timothy Meek and Timothy Joel Meek
Defendant:
Stancil, Parole Board Members, Denver Parole Department Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Obiagwu v. Jefferson et al
as 1:2025cv25944
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Obiagwu
Defendant:
Mounia Jefferson, Kamala Buck, City of Miami Beach and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Bien-Aime Damus v. Jackson North Medical Center
as 1:2025cv24187
Plaintiff:
Odianna Bien-Aime Damus
Defendant:
Jackson North Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Damu Barnes v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv09088
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours, Inc., Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Damu Barnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
DAMUS et al v. PRIMARK US CORP et al
as 2:2025cv13854
Plaintiff:
MARIE DAMUS and BRYAN CACEIDO
Defendant:
AMEREAM LLC, JOHN DOES 1-10, TROOPER CABA #8122 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bounce v. City of Miami Beach, et al
as 25-12113
Plaintiff:
BOUNCE, LEGAL K. R. CONORY
Defendant:
CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, MIAMI BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT, L. AZICRI and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
