Cases 1 - 10 of 10
RUDOLPH et al v. INTEGRITY CONSTRUCTION AND WINDOWS, INC.
as 2:2024cv01029
Plaintiff:
ELLIOT RUDOLPH and DAN COOK
Defendant:
INTEGRITY CONSTRUCTION AND WINDOWS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Rudolph et al v. , Integrity Construction and Windows, Inc.,
as 2:2024cv01030
Plaintiff:
Elliot Rudolph and Dan Cook
Defendant:
, Integrity Construction and Windows, Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Cook v. The Liberty Hospital Foundation
as 4:2024cv00134
Plaintiff:
Dan Cook
Defendant:
The Liberty Hospital Foundation doing business as Liberty Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Pogue v. Floyd et al
as 4:2017cv00662
Plaintiff:
Jeremy R Pogue
Defendant:
Jeremy Floyd and Dan Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mains v. Masterson et al
as 4:2017cv00633
Plaintiff:
Marvin Leroy Mains
Defendant:
Chad Masterson, John Clarke, Russell Earls and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gaye Lynn Brewer v. Martin Bodenhausen, et al
as 16-15328
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GAYE LYNN DILEK BREWER
Defendant - Appellee:
MARTIN BODENHAUSEN, CEO, ANDREA ROSENBAUM, YMCA NW FLORIDA and others
BREWER v. BODENHAUSEN et al
as 3:2015cv00154
Plaintiff:
GAYE LYNN BREWER
Defendant:
MARTIN BODENHAUSEN, ANDREA ROSENBAUM, YMCA NW FLORIDA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glunt v. Gatsby Entertainment, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv02773
Plaintiff:
Lysa Glunt
Defendant:
Gatsby Entertainment, Inc. , Rob Mersis and Dan Cook
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Cook v. Sandstrom
as 6:2012cv00822
Defendant:
Ed Bowles, Roxie Burns, Jonathan Herman and others
Plaintiff:
Dan Cook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv02146
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
