Cases 1 - 10 of 43
v. RTR Properties, LLC et al
as 3:2026cv00388
Defendant:
RTR Properties, LLC, Eagle CDI, Inc. and Dan Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
INGRAM v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 1:2026cv01563
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. INGRAM, JR.
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, CENTURION HEALTH, DAN MITCHELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RAMOS v. MITCHELL et al
as 3:2026cv00117
Plaintiff:
NICOLAS RAMOS
Defendant:
DAN MITCHELL, KELLY ALLEN and GREG SANDERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TERRILL v. MITCHELL et al
as 3:2026cv00103
Plaintiff:
JEREMY ALLEN TERRILL
Defendant:
DAN MITCHELL, ANDY ARNDT, ANDREW WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALLEN v. ARNOLD et al
as 3:2025cv00262
Petitioner:
DAVID JOSEPH ALLEN
Respondent:
LLOYD ARNOLD and DAN MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BOYD v. ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES LLC. et al
as 3:2025cv00252
Plaintiff:
DEREK BOYD
Defendant:
ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES LLC., DAN MITCHELL, GOAD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Hooper et al
as 3:2025cv00549
Plaintiff:
Dan Mitchell
Defendant:
Timothy Hooper, Donnie Bordelon, Sheila Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mitchell v. Fleming et al
as 3:2025cv00550
Plaintiff:
Dan Mitchell
Defendant:
Ashleigh Fleming, Stephanie Michel, Kristen Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GREEN v. MITCHELLE et al
as 3:2025cv00072
Plaintiff:
TYLER DALE GREEN
Defendant:
DAN MITCHELLE, H. SODREL, CRONIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCHWOEPPE v. MITCHEL
as 3:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
JOHN SCHWOEPPE, JR.
Defendant:
DAN MITCHEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.