Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Lloyd Murray, Jr., et al v. ILG Technologies, LLC, et al
as 19-11607
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LLOYD DAN MURRAY, JR., Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and JENNIFER MCGHAN, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
ILG TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, d.b.a. ILG Information Technologies and BARIS MISMAN, Individually and a Sole Proprietor of ILG Information Technologies
MURRAY v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv07193
Defendant:
NOVARTIS CONSUMER HEALTH INC., GLAXOSMITHKLINE CONSUMER HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS (US) LLC, TAKEDA DEVELOPMENT CENTER AMERICAS INC. F/K/A TAKEDA GLOBAL RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC and others
Plaintiff:
DAN MURRAY
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Murray et al v. ILG Technologies, LLC et al
as 4:2018cv00110
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Dan Murray, Jr. and Jennifer McGhan
Defendant:
ILG Technologies, LLC and Baris Misman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Murray v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2017cv04845
Plaintiff:
Dan Murray
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peter Palmer v. Glenn Savona, et al
as 13-17261
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PETER MICHAEL PALMER
Defendant - Appellee:
GLENN A. SAVONA, individually and in his official capacity as Prescott City Prosecutor and husband, JANE DOE SAVONA, wife, DAN MURRAY, individually and in his official capacity as City of Prescott police department employee and husband and others
Peter Palmer v. City of Prescott, et al
as 11-15086
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PETER MICHAEL PALMER
Defendant - Appellee:
UNKNOWN GILL, named as: Jane Doe Gill/ wife, KEN MORLEY, husband, UNKNOWN OAKS, named as: Jane Doe Oaks/ wife and others
Palmer v. Prescott, City of et al
as 3:2010cv08013
Plaintiff:
Peter Michael Palmer
Defendant:
Prescott, City of, Randy L Oaks, Unknown Oaks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
