Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Robinson v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2026cv01676
Plaintiff:
Shanell Daneil Robinson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 425 Social Security Benefits
Rodriguez et al v. Halverson et al
as 1:2026cv07146
Plaintiff:
Daneil Rodriguez and Edward Kijowski
Defendant:
Ernest Halverson, Edwin Dickinson, Reynaldo Guevara and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Sampson v. Daneil et al
as 1:2024cv07109
Defendant:
FedEx Ground Package System, Inc and Larry Daneil
Plaintiff:
Romane Sampson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Antoine TrambleIn re: Antoine Tramble
as 24-1869
Respondent:
JAMES R. SCHIEBNER, Warden
Petitioner:
In re: ANTOINE DANEILL TRAMBLE
Tramble #458780 v. Schiebner
as 1:2024cv00865
Respondent:
James Schiebner
Petitioner:
Antoine Daneill Tramble #458780
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States of America v. Wilson
as 24-2142
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DANEIL FRANCIS WILSON, II
Cartagena et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2023cv08711
Plaintiff:
Israel Cartagena, Annieli Acevedo, Maryalice Alston-Harris and others
Defendant:
City of New York and New York City Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Benshoof v. Admon et al
as 2:2023cv01392
Plaintiff:
Kurt A Benshoof and Kurt Benshoof
Defendant:
Moshe Admon, Daniel Auderer, Justin Booker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
SECREST v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv13279
Plaintiff:
DANEIL SECREST
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00065
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
