Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Crockett v. Bailey et al
as 3:2013cv00520
Plaintiff:
Darrett Damon Crockett
Defendant:
Daniel E. Bailey and T Noble
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Patrick Christian v. Rodney Moore
as 13-1367
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICK O. CHRISTIAN
Defendant - Appellee:
RODNEY MOORE, DANIEL E. BAILEY, JR., JAMES TOWNSEND and others
Christian v. Moore et al
as 3:2013cv00100
Plaintiff:
Patrick O. Christian
Defendant:
Rodney Moore, Daniel E. Bailey, Jr., James Townsend and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Bey v. Cooper et al
as 3:2012cv00454
Plaintiff:
Yu'Sunrus Bey
Defendant:
Roy Cooper , Elaine F. Marshall , Martha H. Curran and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Brown v. Bailey et al
as 3:2012cv00272
Plaintiff:
Joe Nathan Brown
Defendant:
Daniel E. Bailey and Michael Laboo
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Bailey et al
as 3:2012cv00185
Plaintiff:
Joe Nathan Brown
Defendant:
Daniel E. Bailey and Michael Laboo
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. BAILEY et al
as 1:2012cv00202
Plaintiff:
JOE NATHAN BROWN
Defendant:
DANIEL E. BAILEY, LABOO and SHERIFF MECKLENBURG COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Patrick Christian v. James Townsend
as 12-1100
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICK O. CHRISTIAN
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES TOWNSEND, Property Manager, Monroe Hall, RODNEY MOORE, Chief of Police, Charlotte Mecklenburg Police Department, DANIEL E. BAILEY, JR., Sheriff, Mecklenburg County Sheriff Department and others
Christian v. Townsend et al
as 3:2012cv00021
Plaintiff:
Patrick O. Christian
Defendant:
James Townsend, Rodney Moore, Daniel E. Bailey, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985
Carter v. State of NC et al
as 3:2012cv00011
Plaintiff:
Dianne Michele Carter
Defendant:
State of NC, Mecklenburg County, Mecklenburg County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
