Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Hess v. MedTorque Inc
as 2:2024cv00473
Plaintiff:
Daniel Hess
Defendant:
MedTorque Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
General Insurance Company of America v. Hess et al
as 4:2024cv11043
Plaintiff:
General Insurance Company of America
Defendant:
Daniel Hess d/b/a Hess Wood Floor Service and USAA Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
HESS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv23294
Plaintiff:
DANIEL HESS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Daniel Hess v. United States
as 23-2257
Petitioner / Appellant:
Daniel Hess, also known as Jason Hess
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Merchants Mutual Insurance Co. v. Hess
as 2:2023cv10523
Plaintiff:
Merchants Mutual Insurance Co.
Defendant:
Daniel Hess Daniel Hess d/b/a Hess's Affordable Wood Floor Service and Daniel Hess Doing business as Hess's Affordable Wood Floor Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Burrell v. Uhler et al
as 9:2022cv01178
Plaintiff:
Ako K. Burrell
Defendant:
Donald Uhler, Reginald Bishop, S. Donnelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HESS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv85412
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL HESS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hess v. United States of America
as 5:2020cv05005
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Daniel Hess
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
United States v. Daniel Hess
as 17-2123
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Daniel Hess
Pou v. Skill Survey, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv00261
Plaintiff:
Danielle Hess Pou
Defendant:
Skill Survey, Inc., Hood Medical Group, Inc., Ann Best and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
