Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Kim v. Healey
as 1:2026cv13659
Plaintiff:
Daniel Kim
Defendant:
Maura Healey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lopez v. County of Orange, et al.
as 26-3151
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR LOPEZ
Defendant:
COUNTY OF ORANGE, ANDREW DO, FRANK KIM and others
Bass v. Kim
as 3:2026cv01092
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bass
Defendant:
Daniel Kim
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lopez v. County of Orange, et al.
as 26-1969
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR LOPEZ
Defendant:
COUNTY OF ORANGE, CALIFORNIA SUPERIOR COURT, DOES 1-100 and others
Lopez v. County of Orange, et al.
as 26-1341
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR LOPEZ
Defendant:
COUNTY OF ORANGE, ANDREW DO, Board Supervisor, individual capacity, FRANK KIM, Orange County Chief Executive Officer, individual capacity and others
Lopez v. County of Orange, et al.
as 26-328
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR LOPEZ
Defendant:
COUNTY OF ORANGE, ANDREW DO, Board Supervisor, individual capacity, FRANK KIM, ATTORNEY, Orange County Chief Executive Officer, individual capacity and others
Arthur Lopez v. County of Orange et al
as 8:2026cv00087
Plaintiff:
Arthur Lopez
Defendant:
County of Orange, Andrew Do, Frank Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lopez v. County of Orange et al
as 3:2025cv02996
Defendant:
County of Orange, Andrew Do, Frank Kim and others
Plaintiff:
Art Lopez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Evans v. City of San Diego et al
as 3:2025cv01094
Plaintiff:
Marcus Evans
Defendant:
City of San Diego, Officer Alan Dyemartin, Officer Techeakboth Uch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Right Denial of Due Process
ELLING v. YELLO MONKEY LLC
as 2:2025cv01683
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW ELLING
Defendant:
YELLO MONKEY LLC, ANDREW KIM and DANIEL KIM
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 (b)(3) Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
