Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Benjamin Diversification Corporation v. Great American Insurance Company of New York et al
as 4:2023cv01238
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Diversification Corporation and Benjamin Diversification Corporation doing business as Comark Direct
Defendant:
Great American Insurance Company of New York, Justin Lowrimore and Daniel Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Kendricks v. USA Department of Justice et al
as 6:2023cv00701
Plaintiff:
Sheila Denise Kendricks
Defendant:
USA Department of Justice, State of Texas A.G.'s Office, Methodist Children's Home and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Powell v. City of Rusk, TX et al
as 9:2022cv00081
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Powell
Defendant:
City of Rusk, TX and Daniel Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Moore v. MidFirst Bank
as 4:2022cv01349
Plaintiff:
Danielle Moore
Defendant:
MidFirst Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv12270
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Moore v. Warden, FCI Texarkana
as 5:2017cv00112
Petitioner:
James Daniel Moore
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Texarkana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Washington v. Moore et al
as 5:2017cv00050
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Washington
Defendant:
Daniel Moore , Cactus Drilling Co L L C and Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moore v. USA
as 4:2017cv00014
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
James Daniel Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Daniel Moore v. Burl Cain, Warden
as 14-31386
Petitioner - Appellant:
DANIEL MOORE
Respondent - Appellee:
BURL CAIN, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY
Moore v. Cain et al
as 2:2014cv01209
Plaintiff:
Daniel Moore
Defendant:
N. Burl Cain
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
