Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Holmes v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv03386
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc
Plaintiff:
Mr. Daniel Ray Holmes, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brown et al v. Hanover American Insurance Company, Inc., et al
as 2:2020cv02415
Defendant:
Hanover American Insurance Company, Inc., Goodman-Gable-Gould Adjuster/International, Inc.,, Coastal Technical Services, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ray Mott, Tatooed Millionaire Entertainment, LLC and Christopher Calib Brown
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Bush v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2020cv02526
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ray Bush, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Daniel DavisIn re: Daniel Davis
as 19-1593
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
In re: DANIEL RAY DAVIS
Reams v. SSA
as 6:2018cv00270
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ray Reams
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Murphy v. Social Security Commissioner (JRG3)
as 3:2018cv00040
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ray Murphy
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
v. Michigan, State of, Department of Michigan State Police et al
as 1:2017cv12422
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Department of Michigan State Police, Michigan, State of - Department of Natural Resources, Tuscarora Township Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vogel v. Michigan, State of - Department of Natural Resources et al
as 1:2017cv12425
Plaintiff:
Matthew Carl Vogel
Defendant:
Michigan, State of - Department of Natural Resources, Michigan, State of, Department of Michigan State Police, Tuscarora Township Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel Dosenberry v. Carmen Palmer
as 16-2175
Petitioner - Appellant:
DANIEL RAY DOSENBERRY
Respondent - Appellee:
CARMEN DENISE PALMER, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
