Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Fayak et al v. Earl et al
as 1:2023cv00486
Plaintiff:
Mark Fayak, John E Russell, III, Danny Gordon and others
Defendant:
Steven Earl, Robert Carlton, Jennifer Earl and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
GORDON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv01075
Plaintiff:
DANNY GORDON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ALMENDINGER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv00777
Plaintiff:
DAVID ALMENDINGER, BLAIR ASHBY, STEVE BALLARD and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
GORDON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv68547
Plaintiff:
DANNY GORDON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
David Almendinger, et al v. 3M Company, et al
as 21-3238
Plaintiff / Appellee:
David Almendinger, Blair Ashby, Steve Ballard and others
Defendant / Appellant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Almendinger et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2021cv01665
Plaintiff:
David Almendinger, Blair Ashby, Steve Ballard and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
GORDON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv02827
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANNY GORDON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Queen et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 4:2019cv00480
Plaintiff:
Chrissy Lee Queen and Danny Gordon Queen
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sanders v. Davis et al
as 1:2009cv00447
Plaintiff:
Dandy Dewight Sanders
Defendant:
Davis, Crystal Early, Phyllis Simms and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
