Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Smith v. Smith et al
as 3:2015cv03094
Plaintiff:
Bernard Anthony Smith
Defendant:
Cornell Smith, Kathy Weiss, Pam Wise and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ricky Ashley v. Doc Holladay, et al
as 13-1596
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ricky Ashley
Plaintiff:
Clevelen Bosley, Reginald Smith, Michael D. Davis and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Doc Holladay, Sheriff, Pulaski County, Randy Morgan, Chief, Pulaski County Detention Facility, Shawn Smith, Intake Commander, Pulaski County Detention Facility and others
Ashley et al v. Holladay et al
as 4:2012cv00388
Plaintiff:
Ricky Ashley, Clevelen Bosley, Reginald Smith and others
Defendant:
Doc Holladay, Randy Morgan, Shawn Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darius Jackson v. Ray Hobb
as 11-2048
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Darius Jackson
Defendant - Appellee:
Ray Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Jackson v. Hobbs
as 5:2010cv00255
Plaintiff:
Darius Jackson
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Whiting v. United States of America
as 1:2009cv00182
Plaintiff:
Darius Terrel Whiting
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Guyton v. Dormire
as 4:2009cv00820
Petitioner:
Darius Guyton
Respondent:
Dave Dormire
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Darius Ramanauskas v. United States, et al
as 09-1613
Petitioner - Appellant:
Darius Ramanauskas
Respondent - Appellee:
United States of America, Condoleezza Rice, Alberto Gonzales and others
Ramanauskas v. United States of America et al
as 0:2008cv06223
Petitioner:
Darius Ramanauskas
Respondent:
United States of America, Condoleeza Rice, Alberto Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Nicholson v. Steele
as 4:2008cv00728
Petitioner:
Darius Nicholson
Respondent:
Troy Steele
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
