Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Marshall et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv13648
Plaintiff:
Larry Marshall, Michael Marshall, Songa N. Marshall and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 a1 Federal Officer Removal
Marshall et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2025cv09311
Plaintiff:
Larry Marshall, Michael Marshall, Songa N. Marshall and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
DeVille v. USA
as 2:2022cv05077
Petitioner:
Darnold Troy DeVille
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00403
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
DARNOLD III v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv51855
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN MARK ROBERT DARNOLD III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DeVille v. USA
as 2:2019cv02556
Petitioner:
Darnold Troy DeVille
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
USA v. Darnold DeVille
as 18-30706
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DARNOLD TROY DEVILLE, also known as Spooky Red Deville, also known as Troy Deville, also known as Spook Deville, also known as Red Deville
DARNOLD v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2017cv00096
Plaintiff:
AMY F. DARNOLD
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES INC. , IMERYS TALC AMERICA INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Darnold v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as WVN/1:16-cv-00225
Plaintiff:
Amy F. Darnold
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc. , Imerys Talc America, Inc. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
