Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Darrell Livingston v. William Stephens, Director
as 13-40821
Petitioner - Appellant:
DARRELL GLENN LIVINGSTON
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Gem Pratts v. Doe et al
as 1:2012cv09438
Plaintiff:
Gem Pratts , David Pittman , Jerry M. Brown and others
Defendant:
Anthony DeBois, Darryl Starks, Andre Webb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lee v. Berry
as 3:2012cv01562
Plaintiff:
Darrell Glenn Lee, I
Defendant:
Marshall Berry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Darrell Wales v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 11-41120
Petitioner - Appellant:
DARRELL GLENN WALES
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Livingston v. Thaler
as 3:2011cv00423
Petitioner:
Darrell Glenn Livingston
Defendant:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ahmad et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 0:2009cv02476
Plaintiff:
Indris S. Ahmad, Indris S. Ahmad, Indris S. Ahmad and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic International Technology, Inc. and Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Type:
Other Statutes
Ahmad et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 4:2009cv02612
Plaintiff:
Indris S. Ahmad, Donald R. Andress, Edmund A. Arnado and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic International Technology, Inc. and Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wales v. Director - Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
as 1:2008cv00384
Petitioner:
Darrell Glenn Wales
Respondent:
Director - Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
