Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Ellis v. Chicago et al
as 1:2014cv08216
Plaintiff:
Darryl Ellis
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Marvin Bonnstetter and Kevin Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darryl Ellis v. USA
as 14-10047
Petitioner - Appellant:
DARRYL ELLIS
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Darryl Ellis v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
as 11-12914
Petitioner - Appellant:
DARRYL ELLIS
Respondent - Appellee:
FCI COLEMAN - MEDIUM WARDEN
Ellis v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
as 5:2011cv00123
Petitioner:
Darryl Ellis
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Linkex Inc v. CH Robinson Company et al
as 3:2010cv02372
Defendant:
CH Robinson Company , CH Robinson International Inc and Darryl Ellis
Plaintiff:
Linkex Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Ellis v. Dolgencorp, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00322
Defendant:
DOLGENCORP, INC. , DOLLAR GENERAL PARTNERS , DOLGENCORP OF NEW YORK, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
DARRYL ELLIS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Ellis v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 5:2009cv00487
Petitioner:
Darryl Ellis
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hamilton et al v. Koppers Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00129
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Margaret Pennie, Frank Quiniero, William J. Manas, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Ernest Hanks, Patrick ONeal Jackson, Chester Jackson and others
Defendant:
Koppers Industries, Inc. and Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cummings et al v. Koppers Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00132
Plaintiff:
Jostonia Cummings, Melvin Cummings, Zalmunda Cummings and others
Defendant:
Koppers Industries, Inc., Koppers Industries, Inc., Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
