Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Jackson v. City of Stockton et al
as 2:2024cv01219
Plaintiff:
Darryl Jackson
Defendant:
City of Stockton and Anthony Perry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05141
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Jackson v. The 23rd Judicial Circuit Court et al
as 1:2020cv03989
Respondent:
The 23rd Judicial Circuit Court
Petitioner:
Darryl Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jackson v. Nottmeier
as 3:2020cv50263
Respondent:
The 23rd Judicial Circuit Court and Travis Nottmeier
Petitioner:
Darryl Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bell v. Jackson, et al
as 6:2018cv00122
Plaintiff:
Sylvanius Bell
Defendant:
Nicky Jackson, Darryl Jackson, Kevin Klein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
USA v. Darryl Jackson
as 16-2415
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DARRYL JACKSON
Ronald Bankston v. Louisiana State, et al
as 16-30190
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD BANKSTON
Defendant - Appellee:
LOUISIANA STATE, MARLIN N. GUSMAN, Sheriff, BONITA J. PITTMAN, Major, OPP and others
Jackson v. McCarthy et al
as 1:2016cv00626
Plaintiff:
Darryl Jackson
Defendant:
Gary McCarthy, Babich, Zelig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bankston v. Louisiana State et al
as 2:2015cv01222
Plaintiff:
Ronald Bankston
Defendant:
Louisiana State, Marlin N. Gusman , Bonita J. Pittman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shannon Graves, et al v. Mahoning County, et al
as 15-3175
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHANNON GRAVES, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated, MICHELLE BENNER, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated, AMBER SEXTON, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MAHONING COUNTY, AUSTINTOWN TOWNSHIP, BEAVER TOWNSHIP and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
