Cases 1 - 10 of 73
Klum et al v. City of Davenport et al
as 3:2023cv00043
Plaintiff:
Nicole Klum and Wanda Albright
Defendant:
City of Davenport and Mason Roth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 d Civil Rights (Death)
Healthcare Services Group, Inc v. Davenport, Jr Revocable Trust et al
as 5:2022cv04045
Plaintiff:
Healthcare Services Group, Inc
Defendant:
Fred Davenport, Jr Revocable Trust, Larry Book, Successor Trustee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Lloyd v. Telleen et al
as 4:2022cv00223
Plaintiff:
Lamont Lloyd
Defendant:
John Telleen, Micah P. Johnson, Derek G. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00084
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12102
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00264
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132
Rubalcava v. City of Davenport Police Department et al
as 4:2021cv00058
Defendant:
Does Officers Involved and City of Davenport Police Department
Petitioner:
Carlos P. Rubalcava
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415
Tennant et al v. Featherstone et al
as 3:2019cv00077
Defendant:
Mark Cady, Brent Appel, Paul Macek and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Tennant, Kenneth Tennant, Kenneth C. Tennant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Zabloudil v. City of Davenport, Legal Department, et al
as 3:2019cv00066
Defendant:
John Powell, City of Davenport, Legal Department and City of Davenport
Plaintiff:
Teresa Zabloudil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
