Cases 1 - 10 of 21,736
David James, Jr. v. Roanoke City Sheriff's Office
as 24-6479
Plaintiff:
DAVID RANDALL JAMES, JR.
Defendant:
ROANOKE CITY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
Ackerman v. Rigney et al
as 2:2024cv00935
Plaintiff:
Jin Ackerman
Defendant:
Curtis Rigney, T. Phelps, William Gittere and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LETTIERI v. MONDELEZ GLOBAL LLC
as 2:2024cv06254
Plaintiff:
DAVID C. LETTIERI
Defendant:
MONDELEZ GLOBAL LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paige v. Marshall et al
as 3:2024cv00060
Petitioner:
Brianna Nicole Paige, Brianna Ann Sunshine and William Allen LaRue
Respondent:
William Marshall, Shelby O. Searls, Sherry Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weber v. Daniels et al
as 6:2024cv00263
Plaintiff:
David A. Weber
Defendant:
Duane Daniels, District Attorney and Judge FNU Tibby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Harrison v. Birtwell et al
as 2:2024cv01413
Plaintiff:
Michael David Harrison
Defendant:
Birtwell, Moore, Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weber v. Daniels et al
as 1:2024cv00543
Plaintiff:
David A. Weber
Defendant:
Duane Daniels, District Attorney and Judge FNU Tibby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRUM v. FLORIDA COMMISSION ON OFFENDER REVIEW et al
as 4:2024cv00210
Plaintiff:
JODY MAURICE CRUM
Defendant:
FLORIDA COMMISSION ON OFFENDER REVIEW, MARK HIERS, MELINDA N COONROD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOLLINGSHED v. DAVIS et al
as 5:2024cv00151
Plaintiff:
GARY HOLLINGSHED
Defendant:
SHERIFF DAVID DAVIS and AMBER COOK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miles v. Doe #1 et al
as 3:2024cv01285
Plaintiff:
Billy Miles
Defendant:
John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and David Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
