Cases 1 - 10 of 137
RIVERA v. CITY OF BUTLER et al
as 1:2019cv00134
Defendant:
OFFICER JOHN DOE, CITY OF BUTLER, OFFICER BRIAN GROOM and others
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA RIVERA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS v. BLACK & DECKER (U.S.) INC.
as 3:2018cv00244
Defendant:
BLACK & DECKER (U.S.) INC.
Plaintiff:
DAVID ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
RAPOPORT v. GILMORE et al
as 5:2018cv02971
Petitioner:
DAVID ADAM RAPOPORT
Respondent:
JAMES MARTIN, SUPERINTENDENT ROBERT GILMORE and JOSH SHAPIRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ADAMS v. GLASS et al
as 3:2016cv00228
Plaintiff:
SHAUN DAVID ADAMS
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT GLASS, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BOYER and JOHN DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
ADAMS v. GLASS et al
as 3:2016cv00218
Plaintiff:
SHAUN DAVID ADAMS
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT GLASS, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BOYER and JOHN DOE CORRECTIONAL OFFICER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
ADAMS v. SUPERINTENDENT CAMERON et al
as 3:2016cv00009
Plaintiff:
SHAUN DAVID ADAMS
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT CAMERON, DEPUTY J. CLOSE, DEPUTY HOLLIBAUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2013cv06101
Plaintiff:
BRENT DAVID ADAMS , KAREN ADAMS , MICHAEL BENNETT and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE and NFL PROPERTIES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ADAMS v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM
as 2:2011cv02552
Plaintiff:
DAVID ADAMS
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS v. AO SMITH CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv71582
Plaintiff:
DAVID ADAMS
Defendant:
AO SMITH CORPORATION, AO SMITH CORPORATION, A W CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
ADAMS v. AO SMITH CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv71559
Plaintiff:
DAVID ADAMS
Defendant:
AO SMITH CORPORATION, AO SMITH CORPORATION, A W CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
