Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00731
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Diaz v. EXTREME PAQ LOGISTICS CORP et al
as 1:2023cv22941
Plaintiff:
Antonio Diaz
Defendant:
EXTREME PAQ LOGISTICS CORP and DAVID SOSA CHAVEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Chavez Estrada v. Garland
as 23-833
Petitioner:
DAVID OMAR CHAVEZ ESTRADA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Estate of David Pelaez Chavez et al v. County of Sonoma et al
as 4:2022cv06715
Plaintiff:
Estate of David Pelaez Chavez, by and through successor in interest, Rosa Lopez Cruz, Rosa Lopez Cruz, D.D.P.L., S.S.P.L. Estella Chavez Cruz and others
Defendant:
County of Sonoma and Michael Dietrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FLORES CHAVEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv08785
Plaintiff:
DAVID FLORES CHAVEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Daigle v. Mathew et al
as 1:2022cv00147
Plaintiff:
Claudia Daigle
Defendant:
Francis J. Mathew, Julie J Vargas, John P Hays and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv04104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01700
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Brooks et al v. Commonwealth Edison Company et al
as 1:2020cv04555
Plaintiff:
Steven Brooks, David A Chavez, David Chavez and others
Defendant:
Exelon Corporation, Commonwealth Edison and Commonwealth Edison Company doing business as ComEd
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
CHAVEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv67683
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID JESSE CHAVEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
