Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Quichimbo-Caracundo v. Garland
as 24-694
Petitioner: MARTHA CECILIA QUICHIMBO-CARACUNDO, ANGEL ORLANDO ASTUDILLO-FAJARDO, ALEXIS JOEL QUICHIMBO-CARACUNDO and others
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Umanzor-Turcios, et al v. Garland
as 24-1128
Petitioner: DAVID ANTONIO UMANZOR-TURCIOS, JEYDI YULISSA ESCOBAR DE TURCIOS, ASHLEY YULISSA UMANZOR-ESCOBAR and others
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
USA v. Arambula
as 23-50285
Plaintiff / Appellee: United States of America
Defendant / Appellant: David Antonio Arambula
Vasquez-Quintanilla, et al. v. Garland
as 22-1998
Petitioner: RHINA ZULEIMA VASQUEZ-QUINTANILLA and DAVID ANTONIO PORTILLO-VASQUEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Mora-Zendejas v. Garland
as 22-1791
Petitioner: DAVID ANTONIO MORA-ZENDEJAS
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. David Antonio Salazar et al
as 5:2022cv01011
Plaintiff: G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant: David Antonio Salazar individually and d/b/a Jocko's Pub and Jocko's Pub Inc. an unknown business entity d/b/a Jocko's Pub
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1934
Loza-Aguilar v. Garland
as 22-60056
Petitioner: David Antonio Loza-Aguilar
Respondent: Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
David Velasquez Amaya v. William Barr, U. S. Atty Gen We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-60066
Petitioner: DAVID ANTONIO VELASQUEZ AMAYA
Respondent: MATTHEW G. WHITAKER, ACTING U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and WILLIAM P. BARR, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Sidbury v. Southern Loans, Inc.
as 7:2017cv00244
Plaintiff: David Antonio Sidbury
Defendant: Southern Loans, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
USA v. David Paiz-Cornejo We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-41076
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: DAVID ANTONIO PAIZ-CORNEJO

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?