Cases 1 - 10 of 26
BISHAY v. SAYLOR et al
as 1:2025cv03102
Plaintiff:
BAHIG BISHAY
Defendant:
FRANK DENNIS SAYLOR, IV, TREVOR MCFADDEN, AMIT MEHTA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv11179
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
David Barron
as 24-3734
Respondent:
JENNY HILDEBRAND and AMELIA HILL, Warden
Petitioner:
In re: DAVID BARRON
Barron v. Warden, Madison Correctional Institution
as 2:2024cv03848
Respondent:
Warden, Madison Correctional Institution
Petitioner:
David Barron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barron v. Warden, Madison Correctional Institution
as 2:2023cv02977
Petitioner:
David Barron
Respondent:
Warden, Madison Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barron v. Warden, Madison Correctional Institution
as 1:2023cv00591
Petitioner:
David Barron
Respondent:
Warden, Madison Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barron-Martinez v. General Motors, LLC
as 1:2023cv00707
Plaintiff:
David Barron-Martinez
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Wagner v. Mifflin County Pennsylvania et al
as 1:2023cv00100
Plaintiff:
Marhsall T. Wagner and Marshall T. Wagner
Defendant:
Mifflin County Pennsylvania, Dave Barron, Rick Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holston v. English et al
as 2:2020cv14421
Defendant:
Sergeant Sellers, Nurse Romulus, A. Eschevarria and others
Plaintiff:
Reginal L. Holston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BARRON et al
as 2:2016cv13447
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DANA BARRON, DAVID BARRON and BRIANNA BARRON
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
