Cases 1 - 10 of 16
In Re: NON-PARTY SUBPOENAS
as 1:2022mc00060
In Re:
NON-PARTY SUBPOENAS
Petitioner:
NANCY PELOSI, BENNIE G. THOMPSON, ELIZABETH L. CHENEY and others
Respondent:
STEPHEN K. BANNON
BUCKLEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv69067
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID BUCKLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BUCKLEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv10694
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID BUCKLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00469
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1821
Quinn v. Knight et al
as 3:2016cv00610
Plaintiff:
James Quinn
Defendant:
Glade M. Knight , Justin Knight , Kent W. Colton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Timmons Group, Inc. v. Technosylva, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00168
Plaintiff:
Timmons Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Technosylva, Inc. and David Buckley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SEEKFORD v. BUCKLEY
as 1:2015cv00962
Plaintiff:
STANLEY M. SEEKFORD
Defendant:
DAVID BUCKLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams et al v. Merck & Co Inc et al
as 2:2006cv11333
Plaintiff:
Lillian J. Adams, Bridget G. Addison, John Addison and others
Defendant:
Merck & Co Inc and Merck Sharp & Dohme, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Markson v. Central Intelligence Agency et al
as 1:2014cv00814
Plaintiff:
Jim Markson
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency, John D. B., Mark K. and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Carmouche Insurance, Inc. v. Astonish Results LLC, et al
as 1:2014cv00278
Plaintiff:
Carmouche Insurance, Inc.
Defendant:
Astonish Results, LLC , David Buckley and Creekridge Capital, LLC
Counter_claimant:
Creekridge Capital, LLC
Counter_defendant:
Carmouche Insurance, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
