Cases 21 - 30 of 255
Peter Davis v. Merrick B. Garland
as 22-3262
Petitioner:
Peter David Davis
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
David Davis v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-13324
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID DAVIS
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-13285
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv15016
Plaintiff:
DAVID DAVIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv12706
Plaintiff:
RICHARD DAVID DAVIS and RICHARD DAVID DAVIS, II
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Christopher Richardson v. David Davis, et al
as 22-12644
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL RICHARDSON
Defendant / Appellee:
SHERIFF OF MACON-BIBB COUNTY, DAVID DAVIS, MACON-BIBB COUNTY and others
Cox et al v. Association of Oregon Corrections Employees, Inc. et al
as 6:2022cv00906
Plaintiff:
Tracy Cox, Mark Cox, Yvonne Williams and others
Defendant:
Association of Oregon Corrections Employees, Inc., Oregon Department of Administrative Services, Katy Coba and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Meats et al v. Ridley's Family Market, Inc.
as 1:2022cv01070
Plaintiff:
Stanton Meats, Krestina Coombs, David Davis and others
Defendant:
Ridley's Family Market, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00468
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
David Davies et al v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
as 2:2021cv09741
Plaintiff:
David Davies, Jamie Davies and The Davies 210 Trust
Defendant:
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company and DOES 1 to 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
