Cases 71 - 80 of 103
Henderson v. Wilson et al
as 3:2008cv00392
Plaintiff:
David E. Henderson
Defendant:
Joyce E. Wilson, John Cook, Wayne Windle and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Henderson v. Mueller
as 08-51033
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID E HENDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT MUELLER, Director of Federal Bureau of Investigation, Washington, DC
Henderson v. Mitchell, et al
as 08-51029
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID E HENDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM MITCHELL, Reverend and GREG ALLEN, Chief El Paso Police
HENDERSON v. JOHN DOE et al
as 2:2008cv04645
Plaintiff:
DAVID E. HENDERSON
Defendant:
JOHN DOE and AMTRAK
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Henderson v. Rev. William Mitchell et al
as 3:2008cv00371
Plaintiff:
David E. Henderson
Defendant:
Rev. William Mitchell and Greg Allen
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
David Henderson v. Bureau of Alcohol
as 08-2016
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID E. HENDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, FIREARMS, TOBACCO & EXPLOSIVES, BUREAU OF IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Henderson v. Rice
as 3:2008cv00359
Plaintiff:
David E Henderson
Defendant:
Condolezza Rice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Henderson v. Schad et al
as 3:2008cv00358
Plaintiff:
David E. Henderson
Defendant:
Elizabeth Schad and Thomas A. Schultz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
David Henderson v. Harry Paulson
as 08-1861
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID E. HENDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
HARRY PAULSON, Secretary of the Treasury and THE NATIONAL RECONAISSONCE OFFICE, (NRO)
David Henderson v. Lt. Gen. Keith Alexander
as 08-1862
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID E. HENDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
LT. GEN. KEITH ALEXANDER, The National Security Agency (NSA), HENRY PAULSON, Secretary of the Treasury and STEPHEN HADLEY, The National Security Council, The White House
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
