Cases 51 - 60 of 83
Gonzales v. Sanchez et al
as 1:2015cv00168
Plaintiff:
David Gonzales
Defendant:
Ross Sanchez, Bernalillo County District Attorney's Office and Daniel Salazar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ralph Gomez v. Arturo Koenig, et al
as 14-56409
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RALPH J. GOMEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
ARTURO KOENIG, ZACHARY JORDAN, ISMAEL DAVID GONZALES and others
Prejean v. Daniels et al
as 1:2014cv00368
Plaintiff:
David J Prejean
Defendant:
Charles A Daniels, David Gonzales, Jr, Rebecca Nicholas Mallet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzales v. Stralla et al
as 3:2013cv00648
Defendant:
Chris Fortier, Douglas Hildebrand and Roy L. Stralla
Plaintiff:
David Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzales et al v. Wells Fargo Bank et al
as 6:2013cv00077
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank and U.S. Bank National Association
Plaintiff:
David Gonzales and Norma Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Golden v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2013cv01034
Plaintiff:
Brent Golden
Defendant:
Oklahoma State of, Pottawatomie County of, David Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00973
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Gonzales et al v. Procare Environmental Services, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv02446
Plaintiff:
Jose David Gonzales and Santos Oliva
Defendant:
Procare Environmental Services, LLC and Mark C. Sims
Gonzales et al v. Putnam City Schools Independent School District I-001
as 5:2013cv00610
Plaintiff:
David Gonzales
Defendant:
Putnam City Schools Independent School District I-001
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Hinzo v. State of N.M. Dept. of Corr., et al
as 13-2060
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUSTIN JAMES HINZO
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NEW MEXICO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GEORGE TAPIA, WEXFORD MEDICAL SERVICES and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
