Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Benjamin Woodhouse v. The United States Government et al
as 2:2022cv00285
Plaintiff:
Mr. Benjamin Woodhouse
Defendant:
U.S. Government, Otis D Wright III, Fernando M Olguin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Mr. Benjamin Woodhouse et al v. The United States Government et al
as 2:2022cv00079
Plaintiff:
Havensight Capital LLC, Mr. Benjamin Woodhouse, Havensight Capital L.L.C. and others
Petitioner:
Hon. Manuel Real
Defendant:
Nike Inc., Facebook Inc., Alphabet Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Carson v. County of Stanislaus et al
as 1:2020cv00747
Defendant:
Marlissa Ferreira, City of Modesto, City of Ceres and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Carson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dr. David Harris, III v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
as 8:2018cv00876
Defendant:
Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Dr. David Harris, III
Harris v. David, et al.
as 2:2017cv00665
Plaintiff:
David Harris
Defendant:
O. David and Jeff Ridge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. David, et al.
as 1:2017cv00437
Plaintiff:
David Harris
Defendant:
O. David and Jeff Ridge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. David et al
as 3:2016cv05407
Plaintiff:
David Harris
Defendant:
O. David, Jeff Ridge, Jonathan Kreindler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Denise Harris et al
as 2:2016cv05613
Defendant:
Estate of David Harris, Does and Denise Harris
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Singh et al v. Bunch et al
as 1:2015at00345
Plaintiff:
Praveen Singh and Joyteshna Karan
Defendant:
Kirk Bunch, Frank Navarro, John Evers and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Singh et al v. Bunch et al
as 1:2015cv00646
Defendant:
John Evers, Stanislaus County Sheriff Department, Adam Christianson and others
Plaintiff:
Praveen Singh and Joyteshna Karan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
