Cases 1 - 10 of 12
United States of America v. Holland
as 23-7194
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID HOLLAND, Sealed Defendant 1, David Black and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Holland v. RiteAid Corp. et al
as 2:2023cv02962
Plaintiff:
DAVID HOLLAND and Harold Setliff
Defendant:
RiteAid Corp., John T Standley, Darren Karst and others
Petitioner:
RICHARD PATTERSON, RAFAEL LOPEZ and Jennifer DaSilva
Holland v. RiteAid Corp. et al
as 1:2023cv00589
Plaintiff:
David Holland
Defendant:
RiteAid Corp., John T Standley, Darren Karst and others
Filing Error.
as 1:2023cv00587
Plaintiff:
David Holland
Defendant:
John T Standley, Darren Karst, Heyward Donigan and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-15333
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Raudonis et al v. Jarve et al
as 1:2021cv10329
Defendant:
Tyler Sosin, John Buttrick, John Jarve and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Davis, Walter Raudonis and David Holland
Walter Raudonis v. RealtyShares Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv10107
Defendant:
Edward Forst, Navjot Athwal, IIRR Management Services, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Walter Raudonis, Brad Honeycutt, David Holland and others
Lama et al v. New Century Foundation et al
as 5:2019cv07218
Plaintiff:
Namygyal Dhondup, Zambala Inc., Chin Yuan Chu and others
Defendant:
Craig J Beauchamp, New Century Foundation, David Holland and others
Appellant:
United States and Kiran Meettook Mmi Law Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Lama et al v. New Century Foundation et al
as 1:2019cv02169
Plaintiff:
Namygyal Dhondup, Zambala Inc., Chin Yuan Chu and others
Defendant:
Craig J Beauchamp, New Century Foundation, Winston Kevin McKesson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 bc
US v. Allen Holland
as 17-4341
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ALLEN DAVID HOLLAND
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
