Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Radford v. TTI Outdoor Power Equipment, Inc. d/b/a Ryobi
as 2:2026cv01961
Plaintiff:
David James Radford
Defendant:
TTI Outdoor Power Equipment, Inc. d/b/a Ryobi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Montesdeoca et al v. Bates et al
as 2:2026cv00679
Plaintiff:
William Montesdeoca and Maria Martinez
Defendant:
David James Bates and Stille Riders Logistics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
United States of America v. Adekoya
as 26-795
Defendant:
DAVID DANIYAN, OLUWASEUN ADEKOYA, JERMON BROOKS and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Boris v. Lawver et al
as 5:2026cv02797
Defendant:
David James Lawver and Bradley T. Weimert
Plaintiff:
Boris Iofis
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00105
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
CELV13 LLC et al v. Lawyer et al
as 3:2026cv01680
Plaintiff:
CELV13 LLC and Zachary Cohen
Defendant:
Blue Box 2020 LLC, Turnkey Ventures LLC, Does 1-50 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Parks v. Ezzelarb et al
as 7:2026cv01046
Plaintiff:
Niagell Rashad Smith Parks
Defendant:
Sherif A Ezzelarb, David James Turner, Judge Pete Diamadrous and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00310
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
David Parkins v. U.S. Department of Labor
as 26-10428
Plaintiff:
DAVID JAMES PARKINS
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
David James Healey v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2025cv12437
Plaintiff:
David James Healey
Defendant:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES and Does 1 to 30, in their individual capacities
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
