Cases 1 - 10 of 376
MASTROGIOVANNI v. O'MALLEY
as 5:2024cv01492
Plaintiff:
DAVID JOHN MASTROGIOVANNI
Defendant:
MARTIN OMALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
David Campbell v. County of Vanderburgh, et al
as 24-1518
Plaintiff:
DAVID JOHN CAMPBELL
Defendant:
VANDERBURGH COUNTY, INDIANA, VANDERBURGH COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, STANLEY LEVCO and others
David Campbell v. County of Vanderburgh, et al
as 24-8008
Petitioner:
DAVID JOHN CAMPBELL
Respondent:
VANDERBURGH COUNTY, INDIANA, VANDERBURGH COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, STANLEY LEVCO and others
United States of America v. Lonich
as 24-1678
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DAVID JOHN LONICH
United States of America v. Lonich
as 24-1673
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DAVID JOHN LONICH
David Posta v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-10613
Petitioner:
DAVID JOHN POSTA
Respondent:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
John v. Bolinder et al
as 1:2024cv20348
Plaintiff:
J. David John
Defendant:
Megan Marie Bolinder, Douglas Schrantz, Kristin Pawlik and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Killings et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2024cv00398
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Lemuel Killings, Jr, James Harper, Raymond Harrell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
USA v. David Ridling
as 24-10006
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID JOHN RIDLING
Killings et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2023cv01718
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Lemuel Killings, Jr, James Harper, Raymond Harrell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
