Cases 1 - 10 of 16
USA v. David Jones, Jr.
as 22-13702
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID L. JONES, JR.
Jones v. AT&T Inc.
as 1:2022cv00064
Plaintiff:
David L. Jones
Defendant:
AT&T Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv17789
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID L JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Earnest Warhurst, Jr. v. One Twenty Foot Bertran, et al
as 15-11561
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EARNEST EUGENE WARHURST, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
ONE TWENTY FOOT BERTRAN, her engines, etc., in rem and DAVID L. JONES
Jones v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
as 5:2015cv00187
Petitioner:
David L. Jones
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jemaneh v. University of Wyoming, et al
as 15-1121
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TEWODROS G. JEMANEH
Defendant - Appellee:
THE UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING, THE UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING COLLEGE OF HEALTH SCIENCES, THE UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING SCHOOL OF PHARMACY and others
Jones v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
as 5:2015cv00064
Petitioner:
David L. Jones
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Warhurst v. One Twenty Foot Bertran
as 1:2014cv00245
Plaintiff:
Earnest E. Warhurst, Jr.
Defendant:
One Twenty Foot Bertran and David L Jones
Counter_claimant:
David L Jones
Counter_defendant:
Earnest E. Warhurst, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Jemaneh v. University of Wyoming,The
as 1:2012cv02383
Plaintiff:
Tewodros G. Jemaneh
Defendant:
University of Wyoming, The , University of Wyoming College of Health Sciences, The , University of Wyoming School of Pharmacy, The and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv05015
Defendant:
City of New York, Police Officer Nicole Perl and Police Officers John Doe 1-4
Plaintiff:
David L. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
