Cases 11 - 20 of 23
LANE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv48875
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID LANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LANE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv31555
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID LANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LANE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv78641
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID LANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LANE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv44129
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID LANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCDERMOTT et al v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03261
Plaintiff:
JORY MATHIS, LELAND MARSHALL, CHRIS KELLEY and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mcdermott et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02251
Plaintiff:
Jory Mathis, Leland Marshall, Chris Kelley and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Lane et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2015cv04054
Plaintiff:
David Lane and Dee Anne Lane
Defendant:
DePuy Products Inc , DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Potts v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv01115
Plaintiff:
David Lane Potts
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Potts v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv23801
Plaintiff:
David Lane Potts
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lane et al v. Howmedica Osteonics et al
as 0:2014cv02197
Plaintiff:
Barbara C. Lane and David Lane
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics, Stryker Corp., Stryker Sales Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
