Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Kenneth Shannon v. C. Laird
as 23-6306
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH KENNEDY SHANNON
Defendant / Appellee:
C. MICHAEL LAIRD, BRANDAN MCSHEEHY, Special Agent Drug Enforcement Agency ("DEA"), DAVID LESLIE, T.F.O. and others
Barksdale v. Terra et al
as 3:2022cv02012
Petitioner:
David Leslie Barksdale
Respondent:
Joseph Terra and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shannon v. Laird et al
as 2:2022cv04318
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Kennedy Shannon
Defendant:
C. Michael Laird, Brandan McSheehy, David Leslie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. McGuire III et al
as 1:2020cv03242
Defendant:
Sterling Police Department, Michael Singer, Kimberlee Keleher and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy A. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powell v. Dawson et al
as 5:2018cv01078
Petitioner:
David Leslie Powell, Jr
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Alabama and Warden Dawson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Manning v. People of the State of California
as 3:2016cv00525
Petitioner:
David Leslie Manning, Jr.
Respondent:
People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Manning v. Stainer et al
as 1:2016cv00551
Plaintiff:
David Leslie Manning, Jr.
Defendant:
M Stainer, SATF, S. Fleming and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Manning v. Stainer et al
as 2:2016cv00284
Plaintiff:
David Leslie Manning, Jr.
Defendant:
M Stainer, SATF, S. Fleming and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Manning v. Stainer, et al.
as 2:2015cv02601
Plaintiff:
David Leslie Manning, Jr.
Defendant:
M. Stainer, Elissague and Stephen Loder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Manning v. Stainer, et al.
as 1:2015cv01744
Plaintiff:
David Leslie Manning, Jr.
Defendant:
M. Stainer and CDCR Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
