Cases 1 - 10 of 31
LYON v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. et al
as 2:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
DAVID LYNN LYON
Defendant:
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC., PHILIPS RS NORTH AMERICA LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wawracz v. Walgreen Co. et al
as 0:2023cv02711
Plaintiff:
David Lynn Wawracz
Cross Claimant:
Walgreen Co.
Cross Defendant:
USM, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
ALICEA v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv23610
Plaintiff:
ISRAEL ALICEA, LEROY AHNEE, RICHARD CABBIL and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Alicea et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv02482
Plaintiff:
Israel Alicea, Leroy Ahnee, Richard Cabbil and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Lippard v. Puskas et al
as 4:2023cv00209
Plaintiff:
David Lynn Lippard
Defendant:
David Puskas, Cherokee Nation Businesses, LLC and Cherokee CRC, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
GENTRY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv02644
Plaintiff:
DAVID LYNN GENTRY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BARCLAY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv06034
Plaintiff:
DAVID LYNN BARCLAY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETLY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Woods v. United States of America
as 5:2021cv00458
Plaintiff:
Mr. David Lynn Woods, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Woods v. United States of America
as 5:2021cv00459
Plaintiff:
Mr. David Lynn Woods, Jr. and David Woods, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
LUTHER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv58061
Plaintiff:
DAVID LYNN LUTHER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
